Someone missed Econ 101, Day 1
Being a military retiree, I am eligible for excellent low cost health care coverage, which I pay for, but don't use because my job provides health insurance as part of the compensation package.
Yesterday I got a DoD health care survey, which included this question:
Maybe the health care debate would be more productive if "c" was expunged, using every bit as much ridicule as is required to complete the task, from every government critter's vocabulary.
Yesterday I got a DoD health care survey, which included this question:
For your civilian coverage, do you or your family member pay all or part of the insurance premium?
Please select onea. Yes, I or my family members pay all of the premium
b. Yes, I or my family members pay part of the premium
c. No, coverage is available at no cost
d. Don’t know
Maybe the health care debate would be more productive if "c" was expunged, using every bit as much ridicule as is required to complete the task, from every government critter's vocabulary.
5 Comments:
Something's been bugging me about this.
Free news on the interest. No cost.
Did you mean "Internet" instead of "interest"?
Anyway, there's a difference between "free" to someone and "no cost" to anyone.
Yes, I did mean Internet.
But, from my point of view, no difference at all. If you steal it, it's free to you.
So if someone steals somethings (and it's "free"), there's "no cost to anyone"?
So I have been told, in connection with theft of news stories.
All the cool kids seem to think it is the wave of the future, what I call the Middle Digital Age.
The very advanced ones want you to steal patents, too.
Read Volokh Conspiracy for a few days.
Post a Comment
<< Home